Date -- When was the resource published? Is it current? Does it matter?
Relevance -- Does this resource relate directly to your project? Does it support your ideas or is it counter to them? Who is the intended audience?
Accuracy -- Is the information found here accurate? Does it fit with the other information that you are finding? Is the information biased in some way?
Motivation -- Why was this resource produced? Is it to share information? Is it meant to persuade you to do or think something?
Authority -- Who wrote/created the resource? Can you tell? What are their credentials? Can you tell who the publisher is?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Hanna Primeau
Scholarly Sources | Popular Sources | |
---|---|---|
Audience | Written for Professors, Researchers, Subject Experts | Written for the general public, people without significant experience or education in the field being written about |
Language | Typically uses specialized language with a specific definition within a field | Written in everyday language that can be generally understood by the average reader |
Author | Author's credentials (degrees, experience, or institutional affiliation) are listed in the publication | May be a journalist/reporter or someone who does not have direct experience working in or studying the field they are writing about |
Works Cited | Typically includes an extensive bibliography or words cited | Generally do not include a bibliography at the end |
Original Research | Describes original research done by the author(s) | Reports on research done by others |
Editorial Process | Peer-reviewed or refereed by several experts in the field | Reviewed by a single editor |
Advertisements | Rare | Frequent advertising |
Purpose | To share original research findings, to advance understanding of a theory | To make a profit, to inform, to entertain, to persuade, etc. |