Skip to Main Content

Exercise Science

Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources

Sources are considered primary, secondary, or tertiary depending on the originality of the information presented and their proximity or how close they are to the source of information. This distinction can differ between subjects and disciplines.

In the sciences, research findings may be communicated informally between researchers through email, presented at conferences (primary source), and then, possibly, published as a journal article or technical report (primary source). Once published, the information may be commented on by other researchers (secondary sources), and/or professionally indexed in a database (secondary sources). Later the information may be summarized into an encyclopedic or reference book format (tertiary sources).

Source

Primary Sources

A primary source in science is a document or record that reports on a study, experiment, trial or research project. Primary sources are usually written by the person(s) who did the research, conducted the study, or ran the experiment, and include hypothesis, methodology, and results.

Primary Sources include:

  • Pilot/prospective studies
  • Cohort studies
  • Survey research
  • Case studies
  • Lab notebooks
  • Clinical trials and randomized clinical trials/RCTs
  • Dissertations
    Source

Secondary Sources

Secondary sources list, summarize, compare, and evaluate primary information and studies so as to draw conclusions on or present current state of knowledge in a discipline or subject. Sources may include a bibliography which may direct you back to the primary research reported in the article.

Secondary Sources include:

  • reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analysis
  • newsletters and professional news sources
  • practice guidelines & standards
  • clinical care notes
  • patient education Information
  • government & legal Information
  • monographs
  • entries in nursing or medical encyclopedias
    Source

Examples

Review the abstracts for both articles. How are these scholarly articles different? What is being reported in each article? Why are they classified (primary or secondary) in this way?

  1. Source # 1 -- Shafizadeh, M., Farina, N., & Parvonpour, S. (2023). Effects of Motor Learning Interventions on Walking Performance and Physical Function in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Aging & Physical Activity, 31(2), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2021-0442
  2. Source # 2 -- Mousavi, S. M., & Iwatsuki, T. (2022). Easy Task and Choice: Motivational Interventions Facilitate Motor Skill Learning in Children. Journal of Motor Learning & Development, 10(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2021-0023